![chrome for mac 10.5 chrome for mac 10.5](https://cdn.mscdirect.com/global/images/ProductImages/2866541-21.jpg)
Thus, web applications are winning over client-server network apps, scripting languages over compiled ones, declarative database queries over complex array manipulation, etc… And, history also shows that the perceived weakness of the abstraction can be more quickly optimized away than the converse weakness of the non-abstracted approach. Yes (although it is only one factor out of many), but it is a very useful abstraction, and I think history shows that in the long run, victory goes to the one with the more useful abstraction. The Firefox interface is entirely made in XUL and rendered by Gecko. I think XUL is both the strength and weakness of Firefox. It’s going to be interesting to see how this plays out. NO other browser has accomplished this.Įither way, I hope the Google and Mozilla teams continue to inspire each other to give us the best. I can run Firefox on Windows, Mac, FreeBSD, Linux, NetBSD, Solaris, just about anything with a GUI, and the behavior is identical.
![chrome for mac 10.5 chrome for mac 10.5](https://community.adobe.com/legacyfs/online/329871_Picture+1.png)
– absolute unity of user experience on just about any OS in use nowadays. – XUL + the collection of extra Javascript classes and libraries that allow a Mozilla extension to do far more than simple HTML/Javascript.
![chrome for mac 10.5 chrome for mac 10.5](https://news-cdn.softpedia.com/images/news2/Download-Google-Chrome-14-0-835-0-for-OS-X-Lion-Dev-Release-2.jpg)
– Javascript 1.8 (and soon Javascript 2.0 - which will be ground-breaking) I know Chrome has an extension API, but here are a few things Chrome does not have: That the Mozilla team succeeded in making a truly re-chromable application when Google really has not is interesting irony. And they have definitely been improving Firefox’s speed recently.įirefox is just a single manifestation of the underlying framework, and it is very easy to re-chrome it a million different ways, even make it unrecognizable, and yet still have the same features (OR even change the features without breaking the core features). From the beginning, the Mozilla developers have taken a verrrry long view to how application can work in a connected world, and no one else has anything quite like what they have developed. I just found it a little, hmm… maybe passive-agressive for Google to use the name.Īnyway yes, Chrome has superficially bested Firefox in terms of raw speed, and perhaps in certain UI aspects, but I’m not so sure that Google has bested Mozilla in the long run. Anyone doing development work with XUL for Firefox extensions or any other aspect of the Mozilla application framework uses this word often. Mozilla has had this convention from the beginning, and I’m sure the Google people knew this. Look through your Firefox installation directory and you will find it.
#CHROME FOR MAC 10.5 WINDOWS 7#
In this case, the two important trends are that Windows 7 is eating away quite well at the base of previous Windows versions, and that Chrome’s star continues to rise.Īm I the only one who detected a certain amount of snark in Google’s name choice for their browser? Anyone who knows Mozilla/FF development knows that ‘Chrome’ is the name of the UI-rendering subsystem in Firefox, and in any Mozilla project. However, even though you shouldn’t take them at face value, they can be used to indicate trends. These are statistics, and therefore, are troublesome. Since both Windows XP and Vista lost share, the logical conclusion is that Windows 7 is competing with previous versions of Windows. Windows 7’s popularity seems to have little effect on Mac and Linux users, as both platforms remained more or less flat at 5.11% and 1.02% respectively. Microsoft’s latest baby already broke the 5% mark, and in December its share amounted to 5.17%, up from November’s 4%.
#CHROME FOR MAC 10.5 MAC OS#
Firefox remained more or less flat at 24.61%, while both Safari and Opera gained slightly.Ĭhrome’s steep rise in December can probably be attributed to the release of the betas for Linux and Mac OS X, so we may see a slight decline again in January, as some people will most certainly fall back upon their established choice of browser.Īs for operating systems, Windows 7 is, unsurprisingly, doing rather well.
#CHROME FOR MAC 10.5 FULL#
Internet Explorer lost almost a full percentage point, dropping to 62.69%. NetApplications’ figures cover the entire month of December 2009, and they show that Google Chrome has gained 0.7 of a percentage point, putting it at 4.63%, ahead of Safari’s 4.46%. IE, by the way, continues to lose popularity rather fast.Ĭhrome was introduced almost 18 months ago, but yet it has already become the third most popular browser in the world. NetApplications has released its latest browser market share figures, and these figures show that Chrome has overtaken Safari as the number three browser worldwide, behind Internet Explorer and Firefox.